Dear Zhenyu Ye,
The reviewing process of ICDSC 2011 for Phd forum and demo papers is over. I’m
happy to inform you that your  paper PhD forum: A Cyber-Physical System
Approach To Embedded Visual Servoing has been accepted for presentation at
ICDSC 2011. Congratulations!

One important remark is that, if you haven't done yet, you should clarify
whether your submission is intended for Phd forum or for demo. In some cases,
this is not completely clear, as also pointed out by the reviewers. 

The reviewers’ comments can be found below. You must upload the camera ready
version of your paper before July 15. By the same date, and in general as soon
as possible, it is very important to confirm your participation to the
conference by registering for the conference, otherwise the paper will be
discarded from the conference proceedings.

Looking forward to see you in Ghent!
Best regards
Andrea Prati
Senem Velipasalar
ICDSC 2011 Program Chairs


----------------------- REVIEW 1 ---------------------
PAPER: 82
TITLE: PhD forum: A Cyber-Physical System Approach To Embedded Visual Servoing
AUTHORS: Zhenyu Ye, Henk Corporaal and Pieter Jonker

OVERALL RATING: 2 (accept)
TECHNICAL CORRECTNESS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair)
NOVELTY / ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good)
REFERENCE TO PRIOR WORK: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good)
QUALITY OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair)
IMPORTANCE TO THE FIELD: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good)
ORGANIZATION AND CLARITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 2 (poor)
SUITABLE FOR THE SPECIAL ISSUE ON ACM TOSN: 3 (Borderline)

Interesting aspect to bring to the PhD forum. Do I understand correctly that
Fig 1 is a traditional approach and a cyber-physical approach will completely
improve the approach?
It is still not completely clear to me after reading the submission. Maybe you
need to give more hints about the cyber-physical approach instead of only
mentioning that it focusses on the challenges well and a reference. 

there are some typos in the abstract and paper that need t be looked into:

use cyber-physical ---> use a cyber-physical

in one of our case study --> in one of our case studies

of time-predictable ---> of a time-predictable

etc.

The color scale of Fig 5 is not really getting good in gray scale. Please make
it gray scale.


----------------------- REVIEW 2 ---------------------
PAPER: 82
TITLE: PhD forum: A Cyber-Physical System Approach To Embedded Visual Servoing
AUTHORS: Zhenyu Ye, Henk Corporaal and Pieter Jonker

OVERALL RATING: 1 (weak accept)
TECHNICAL CORRECTNESS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good)
NOVELTY / ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good)
REFERENCE TO PRIOR WORK: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good)
QUALITY OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair)
IMPORTANCE TO THE FIELD: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair)
ORGANIZATION AND CLARITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair)
SUITABLE FOR THE SPECIAL ISSUE ON ACM TOSN: 3 (Borderline)

I'm not an expert, but this topic seems to me a little bit off-topic for
ICDSC. I'm not saying that correct design methodologies are not important, but
they are more typical in other communities.

However, the contribution seems interesting and can result in fruitful
discussion at the PhD forum.