Dear Zhenyu Ye, The reviewing process of ICDSC 2011 for Phd forum and demo papers is over. I’m happy to inform you that your paper Demonstration of An Embedded Vision System for High Frame Rate Visual Servoing has been accepted for presentation at ICDSC 2011. Congratulations! One important remark is that, if you haven't done yet, you should clarify whether your submission is intended for Phd forum or for demo. In some cases, this is not completely clear, as also pointed out by the reviewers. The reviewers’ comments can be found below. You must upload the camera ready version of your paper before July 15. By the same date, and in general as soon as possible, it is very important to confirm your participation to the conference by registering for the conference, otherwise the paper will be discarded from the conference proceedings. Looking forward to see you in Ghent! Best regards Andrea Prati Senem Velipasalar ICDSC 2011 Program Chairs ----------------------- REVIEW 1 --------------------- PAPER: 78 TITLE: Demonstration of An Embedded Vision System for High Frame Rate Visual Servoing AUTHORS: Zhenyu Ye, Yifan He, Roel Pieters, Bart Mesman, Henk Corporaal and Pieter Jonker OVERALL RATING: 1 (weak accept) TECHNICAL CORRECTNESS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair) NOVELTY / ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair) REFERENCE TO PRIOR WORK: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good) QUALITY OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good) IMPORTANCE TO THE FIELD: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair) ORGANIZATION AND CLARITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair) SUITABLE FOR THE SPECIAL ISSUE ON ACM TOSN: 3 (Borderline) This paper is not really multi-camera, but it can be seen as a huge smart camera. It is interesting to see that finally, the vision system is not the slowest one. How would you fare with the 30K frames per second focal plane arrays that are around? I do not understand why such a professional system has to be cost-driven? Please add a reference for Otsu At first, I didnot understand why you would optimize for utilization in stead of speed. Only nearing the end of the paper I understood the remark in Section III. ----------------------- REVIEW 2 --------------------- PAPER: 78 TITLE: Demonstration of An Embedded Vision System for High Frame Rate Visual Servoing AUTHORS: Zhenyu Ye, Yifan He, Roel Pieters, Bart Mesman, Henk Corporaal and Pieter Jonker OVERALL RATING: 2 (accept) TECHNICAL CORRECTNESS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair) NOVELTY / ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 5 (excellent) REFERENCE TO PRIOR WORK: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good) QUALITY OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good) IMPORTANCE TO THE FIELD: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good) ORGANIZATION AND CLARITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good) SUITABLE FOR THE SPECIAL ISSUE ON ACM TOSN: 3 (Borderline) This will definitely be a nice demo at the conference. Would you bring the entire the system at the conference? I'm curios to collect more details on the FPGA parallelization issue which sounds very interesting. ----------------------- REVIEW 3 --------------------- PAPER: 78 TITLE: Demonstration of An Embedded Vision System for High Frame Rate Visual Servoing AUTHORS: Zhenyu Ye, Yifan He, Roel Pieters, Bart Mesman, Henk Corporaal and Pieter Jonker OVERALL RATING: 2 (accept) TECHNICAL CORRECTNESS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good) NOVELTY / ORIGINALITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good) REFERENCE TO PRIOR WORK: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair) QUALITY OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair) IMPORTANCE TO THE FIELD: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 4 (good) ORGANIZATION AND CLARITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest): 3 (fair) SUITABLE FOR THE SPECIAL ISSUE ON ACM TOSN: 3 (Borderline) The paper presents an FPGA-based vision system to perform ink-jet printing for OLED display manufacturing. The practical issues are presented well.